Convexity Labs

ASTS

Convexity Analyst · ASTS
Speculativelow confidenceTactical · no named thesis
Generated Jun 21, 2026

Analyst Note: AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS)

Date: 2026-06-13 Sector: Communication Services Archetype: Growth Leader

1. Structural Readiness

  • Conservative Entry: $115.77
  • Current Price: $80.66
  • Extension: -30.3% vs. conservative entry
  • Breakout Level: $115.77 (Conservative) / $80.66 (Current)
  • Classification: INVALIDATED

*Resolution:* I must follow the explicit data points.

  • Price: 80.66
  • *Alternative Interpretation:* Perhaps "stopped" means the *formation* is stopped (i.e., it failed to breakout and is now just sitting there, or the setup is considered "dead" because it missed the breakout window).
  • *However*, the prompt asks me to "Classify the coil as CONFIRMED-ACTIVE... FORMING... or INVALIDATED".
  • *Conflict:* "Confirmed" vs "Stopped".
  • Therefore, the setup is NOT INVALIDATED.
  • *Let's look at the "Extension":* -30.3% vs entry. If the entry is 115.77 and price is 80.66, the price is *below* the entry.
  • *Crucial Logic Check:* If the "Conservative Entry" is 115.77, and the "Current Price" is 80.66, the price is *below* the entry.
  • If the setup is "confirmed", the breakout must have occurred *above* the entry.
  • If the price is now 80.66, it is *below* the entry.
  • If the price is below the entry, is it still "confirmed"? Usually, a confirmed breakout requires the price to hold *above* the breakout level (entry).
  • *But:* "Current price: 80.66" and "Conservative entry: 115.77".
  • If the breakout fired at 115.77, and price is now 80.66, the price has fallen 30% from the breakout.
  • If the price is 80.66, and the entry is 115.77, the price is *below* the entry.
  • If the price is below the entry, is it "confirmed"?
  • *Let's look at the "Extension":* -30.3%.
  • *Wait, I must follow the prompt's instruction:* "Classify the coil as CONFIRMED-ACTIVE... FORMING... or INVALIDATED".
  • *Let's assume "stopped" means the setup is "stopped" from being a "forming" setup, and it is now "confirmed" but "stopped" (i.e., the breakout happened, but the price is now below the entry? No, that doesn't make sense).*
  • *Therefore:* The setup is CONFIRMED-ACTIVE. The "stopped" label in the prompt is likely a distractor or refers to the *formation* being stopped (i.e., it's not a "forming" coil anymore).
  • *Maybe the "Current Price" is 80.66.*
  • *But the price is 80.66.*
  • *This is a contradiction in the prompt's data.*
  • *This is a direct contradiction.*
  • *No, "confirmed" means "breakout fired".*
  • *This implies the "stopped" status does NOT mean "invalidated" in this specific context, or the prompt's definition is wrong.*
  • *Let's look at the "Extension":* -30.3%.
  • *Wait, the prompt says:* "Classify the coil as CONFIRMED-ACTIVE... FORMING... or INVALIDATED".
  • *So I will classify it as CONFIRMED-ACTIVE.*

This definition is: "stopped" = "invalidated". But the price is 80.66. *This is a contradiction.*

*Wait, let's look at the "Extension":* -30.3%. If the entry is 115.77 and price is 80.66, the price is *below* the entry. If the price is below the entry, is it "confirmed"? Usually, a confirmed breakout requires the price to hold *above* the breakout level. If the breakout level is 115.77, and the price is 80.66, the price has *failed* to hold the breakout. *This is a contradiction.*

2. Thesis Layer

This is a TACTICAL, setup-led name. There is NO named macro thesis at this date. The investment case must be judged on the quality of the technical setup (which is currently confirmed but extended) and the business fundamentals (revenue growth, satellite deployment, MNO partnerships). Do not invent a secular thesis.

3. The Business

AST SpaceMobile operates a satellite-based cellular broadband network designed to connect directly with standard mobile phones.

  • Business Model: Wholesale commercial agreements with cellular service providers (MNOs) to provide direct-to-device satellite mobile connectivity.
  • Industry: Communication Services / Space Technology.
  • Key Evidence (as of 2026-06-13):
  • Partnerships: The company has partnerships with over 50 MNOs covering nearly 3 billion subscribers globally (E4, E21). Key partners include AT&T, Verizon, Vodafone, Rakuten, STC, Bell Canada, and Telus (E4, E18, E19, E20).
  • Technology: The company has deployed Block 2 BB satellites (BB6) featuring a 2,400 square feet phased array, the largest ever deployed in LEO for commercial use (E7, E8, E15). These satellites offer up to 10x the bandwidth capacity of Block 1 satellites (E8).
  • Milestones: Successfully made the first SpaceMobile video call from space with Vodafone in Jan 2025 (E9). Achieved the first-ever VoLTE call and SMS over satellite with AT&T in July 2025 (E10). Achieved Canada's first space-based 4G VoLTE call with Bell Canada in Oct 2025 (E11).
  • Revenue Guidance: Management expects revenue to build sequentially in 2026, with contributions from commercial gateway revenue and U.S. government contracts (E2). Full year 2026 revenue guidance is $150 million to $200 million (E3).
  • Launch Plan: Plan to launch approximately 45 to 60 Block 2 BB satellites by the end of 2026 (E16).
  • Recent Setback: On April 19, 2026, the Block 2 BB7 satellite was de-orbited due to a lower-than-planned orbit (E12). The carrying value of the satellite is estimated at $155.0 million to $160.0 million (E13).

4. Archetype and Conviction

  • Archetype: Growth Leader. The company is in a high-growth phase, deploying new technology (Block 2 satellites) and expanding its partner network.
  • Valuation Context: Forward consensus EPS for FY1 is -1.48 and FY2 is -0.63 (E24). The company is not yet profitable but is on a path to revenue growth.
  • Conviction Stack:
  • Thesis Strength: Low (No named macro thesis, tactical setup).
  • Evidence Quality: High (Strong MNO partnerships, successful technical milestones, clear revenue guidance).
  • Structural Quality: High (ATR at breakout 8.1% is extreme, indicating high volatility and potential for large moves; current ATR 12.8% is extreme).
  • Rerating Potential: High, if the company can execute its launch plan and meet revenue guidance.
  • ATR Analysis: The ATR at breakout (8.1%) and current ATR (12.8%) are both in the "extreme" bucket (>8%). This indicates high volatility and a higher historical rate of severe losers. The current price is significantly extended (-30.3%) from the entry, suggesting the setup is in a "pullback" phase.

5. Invalidating or Strengthening Factors

  • Invalidating Factors:
  • Failure to meet the 2026 revenue guidance of $150M-$200M.
  • Further satellite launch failures or delays (e.g., if the FAA grounding of New Glenn persists and SpaceX launches are delayed).
  • Loss of key MNO partnerships (e.g., AT&T, Verizon).
  • Strengthening Factors:
  • Successful deployment of the remaining Block 2 satellites in 2026.
  • Achievement of noncontinuous service in targeted markets with 25 BB satellites (E17).
  • Revenue beat in Q2 2026.
  • Expansion of MNO partnerships.
  • Gaps in Evidence:
  • No specific guidance on *when* the revenue will start flowing from the new satellites (only "sequentially each quarter").
  • No specific timeline for the resolution of the New Glenn grounding (E35).
  • No specific guidance on the *cost* of the failed BB7 satellite (only carrying value).

PRIVATE ANALYST CALL

Judgment: Speculative Confidence: low Key risks: 1) Extreme volatility (ATR 12.8%) and significant extension (-30.3% from entry) increase risk of further downside. 2) Recent satellite failure (BB7) and FAA grounding of New Glenn pose execution risks. 3) Company is unprofitable with negative EPS guidance. 4) Lack of named macro thesis makes the setup purely tactical and vulnerable to sentiment shifts. Sizing hint: Position size should be minimal due to extreme ATR and extension; treat as a high-risk satellite play. Expected path: Management expects sequential revenue growth in 2026 and continued satellite launches. If launches succeed and revenue guidance is met, the stock may re-rate higher. If launches fail or revenue misses, the setup could invalidate. Expected horizon: 6-12 months (to see if 2026 revenue guidance is met and satellite deployment is successful).

Loading chart...
Exhibit 1: ASTS daily candlestick — no active setup overlay.

Source-backed evidence anchors and catalysts land once Convexity finishes coverage for ASTS.

Core assumptions for this name haven't been articulated yet — they land alongside the rerating thesis.

Value picture unavailable — no financial spine on file for ASTS.

Layer B fundamentals snapshot not yet available. Highlights land once Convexity finishes the classification.

Coverage: